Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virgil W. Magee (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Virgil W. Magee

Virgil W. Magee (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fails WP:BIO - no non-trivial coverage of subject in WP:RS. Leuko 01:34, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. No third-party sources; PR site. Renee 01:57, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable person. Carlosguitar 02:12, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. low notability for encyclopedic inclusion Jodes534 02:32, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
• delete I see no evidence of notable impact Pete.Hurd 03:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: Reads more like a VITA file. Non-notable. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
• Honorably discharge, perfect example of accomplishment not equalling notability. --Dhartung | Talk 04:34, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Resumecruft. No reliable independent sources. Gamaliel (Angry Mastodon! Run!) 15:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per all above. He's an interesting guy though. Tiptopper 16:51, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.