Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viral diabetes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 16:08, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Viral diabetes

Not a recognized clinical entity. Any theory of viral/environmental causes of diabetes best discussed within the context of diabetes mellitus. InvictaHOG 10:47, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, unsourced. PJM 11:14, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above.--Jusjih 11:23, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Diabetes mellitus. –RHolton≡– 12:01, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per PJM Nearly Headless Nick 12:18, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, new medical articles with no reliable sources provided need to be shown the door quickly, IMO. Plus, the nom is right... it can be discussed in diabetes mellitus, where it'll presumably get attention from interested and qualified parties. - Motor (talk) 13:10, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete - mostly conjecture (i.e, WP:NOR), term is not part of WHO definitions, and possible viral cause of type I is already covered by Diabetes mellitus. As to 'Genetically Modified Foods and Organisms', 'Vaccine Injuries' and 'Theory of Pleomorphism and Metabolic Acidosis', I think this shows this article to be an attempt for an Alternative Medicine fork.David Ruben ^Talk 14:57, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, original research, unsourced, not proven and recognised as a sickness yet. --Terence Ong 14:59, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Strong DeleteWP:NOR Furthermore it's rubbish. Dave59 18:26, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.