Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violet Hill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge pschemp | talk 03:09, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Violet Hill

It's a hill. On a hiking trail. You can see a resevoir from the top. Unless there's a whole heck of a lot more the article isn't telling us, there's nothing notable about it. Icarus 09:03, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

• Merge into Wilson Trail. --Bduke 09:30, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per Bduke Kcordina ^Talk 09:49, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Perhaps the article is weak and requires expansion, however there are many such similarly weak articles that start from List of mountains, peaks and hills in Hong Kong. Should they all be deleted? Should they all be merged into some other Hiking trails. IMO these hills should have their own pages and expanded as needed. TonyB 10:02, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep It's a hill in a major city state. That makes it much more notable than a hill in the wilderness. Osomec 19:24, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into Wilson Trail. Unless there is much more notable information about this hill in particular, the only information in this article is the height of the hill. Surely the Wilson Trail article could stand to grow by 4 bytes. --Deville (Talk) 20:01, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Per Request, more notable information has been added TonyB 06:19, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge Per above. Nigelthefish 15:50, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge or Keep Moe ε 02:22, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.