Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violet Affleck

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 03:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Violet Affleck

Violet Affleck (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

I am putting this up for deletion on behalf of User:Shovon76 and User:NawlinWiki who thought that Violet was not notable enough in her own right. Oore (talk) 01:48, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete There is nothing worth saying about a 3 year old child. Just mention her in her dad's article. Northwestgnome (talk) 02:03, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete The mention in her dad's article is sufficient. This baby is not notable on her own. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:15, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Paradoxsociety (talk) 02:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Notability is not asserted. In fact, the article states that she "seems to be living a typical childhood." The mention in her father's article is enough. If Suri Cruise doesn't get her own article (despite being mentioned frequently in the media), Violent certainly doesn't seem notable enough. GaryColemanFan (talk) 02:37, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Notability is not inherited. Trusilver 03:06, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.