Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinnie Richards

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. —Xezbeth 16:22, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Vinnie Richards

Same case as Hans Nusslein. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayumashu (talk • contribs) 04:51, 26 May 2005

• I've just written an article about Vinnie Richards. So there's no reason to delete it. If I have the strength of character, maybe I'll also do a brief one about Hans Nusslien. Hayford Peirce 18:04, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Agree, keep, definitely encyclopaedic. Noel (talk) 05:42, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• This whole Wikipedia bit about redirects etc. can be very confusing. What I *want* to say is this: keep the link between Vinnie and the Pro Championship listings. Do *not* delete the link or the Hans article. Hayford Peirce 06:01, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Step three of the notification process was not completed. I am fixing the fomatting and completing the nomination. No vote implied. RJFJR 03:21, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. Should be self-explanatory why.The Literate Engineer 03:30, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Looks like a relic of the crusade against the tennis redirects... -- Jonel | Speak 03:58, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, and I do believe that this nomination is partially my fault - I bugged the guy about leaving some {{rfd}} tags lying around. humblefool® 20:22, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand.--Poli 03:34, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.