Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vineyard Vines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 02:31, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vineyard Vines

Vineyard Vines (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not sure this is a notable company; the article makes only a very marginal claim. Parts of it read like an ad. Also, the only references are from vineyardvines.com. Unless we can get a more solid explanation of why this company's notable, I'd say delete. delldot talk 05:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Doesn't have sources for its claim to notability. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 07:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep I've added a citation for the bit about Inc. magazine. Some parts of the article are a little ad-like, but I'd probably say the company's notable enough to merit a Wikipedia entry. Esrever 13:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Still not seeing notability Mbisanz (talk) 15:39, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I don't believe the one reliable source justifies encyclopedic notability. "217th fastest growing company" is not by itself a compelling claim; if it were, Wikipedia would become an archive of Inc. Magazine. Xoloz (talk) 15:56, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.