Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vindication (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Wknight94 (talk) 20:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vindication (film)

Vindication (film) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No notability asserted. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 23:54, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

*Delete - Doesn't even seem to have IMDB user comments. --Tikiwont (talk) 12:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite 02:08, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Google turned up a few useful hits ([1], [2] and [3]), and I could probably find more if I spent more than two minutes looking. Lack of user comments on IMBD is a very weak argument to delete. PC78 (talk) 08:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
I might have misunderstood the release story, since the release date given in IMDB is 2006, in which case I found it remarkable that there isn't any comment, but it was not really intended as a reason for deletion which i saw more in the line of the nomination. Whether the found links to specialized such as the On-the-set report demonstrate sufficient notability is still rather doubtful to me, but I'll abstain here from a !vote. --Tikiwont (talk) 09:18, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Very notable in its particular niche of minority independent film making. Halfmast (talk) 08:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - Nominator's comments aside, the subject fails WP:MOVIE. The links above do not constitute "significant coverage", and I was unable to find any evidence of large-scale release, reviews, etc. Google News archives turn up a scant three articles. --jonny-mt 06:14, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keilana|Parlez ici 01:41, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep links above seem to constitute significant coverage. There are no reviews because the film has yet to be released. Whether, once released, it will meet WP:MOVIE's standards has yet to be determined. --Asmodeus Samael (talk) 04:38, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.