Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vince Cordisco
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete per CSD:G1, G3, G10, A1, and A7, and I'm sure I could find another few. Stifle (talk) 20:17, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Vince Cordisco
AfDs for this article:
If not a hoax, then arguably libelous content. Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 18:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete: Non-notable and possibly a violation of WP:BLP. --SimpleParadox 18:47, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete. Wholly inappropriate article. Qworty (talk) 18:49, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:WHEN-THE-PUMPKIN-KING-GIVES-UP-ON-AN-ARTICLE-YOU-KNOW-IT-SHOULD-BE-GONE :) In all seriousness, this does appear to be an attack page that slid through the recent changes patrolers. No relevant search engine hits of any type, no good version to which we can revert. I'd have no problem with a G10 speedy as an attack page. Good catch by the nom. Xymmax (talk) 18:56, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
-
- That almost should be a real shortcut.... —Quasirandom (talk) 19:37, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
-
- Well, every article I have ever argued to delete has been deleted without exception (see User:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles/Deletion discussions--I wish I could say the same for every article I've argued to keep...). Thus, so far at least, it is has indeed been true that when I give up on an article you know it should be gone. :) Best, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 17:33, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.