Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Villa Heights Elementary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 21:16, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Villa Heights Elementary

Villa Heights Elementary (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested Prod. This elementary school does not assert any notability at all. -- ShinmaWa(talk) 20:17, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Strong delete Per nom. You can pick any policy you want for deletion on this one, from WP:V which is particually important to the demographic information, WP:N because the article is just lacking in that area and a db-spam on this page would be quite appropriate. Just call it WP:SCFT and be done with it. Thewinchester (talk) 22:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. —Thewinchester (talk) 22:22, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete this elementary school article, like most others. It's not much different than any of them. Shalom Hello 22:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep/merge neutral and informative article, a school which is important to education in its area like most others. Kappa 23:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, by Wikipedia policy: elementary schools are not inherently notable. Terraxos 01:58, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete Per above - these schools are not notable. Corpx 07:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, this information is only of any relevence to those in the locality and is available from the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School System webpages, which I see no need for Wikipedia to mirror. I also don't see it as likely that this page will be updated sufficiently. Average Earthman 07:07, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, per nom. Cedars 10:24, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 03:07, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.