Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikas Khanna2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Ifnord 23:57, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vikas Khanna
It was recently listed for Afd (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikas Khanna)) but was speedied due to copyvio. Relisting the new version which, as far as i can find, is not a direct copy from anywhere. Tintin (talk) 03:53, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Reason for the first listing : non-notable, vanity bio, self authored by the subject Batman2005 21:30, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep: I'll go out on a limb here. He's featured here and here and does have several books available on Amazon here. I don't like that someone tried to bypass this and create a Chef Vikas Khanna but he still seems more notable than some of the Afd's that have resulted in keep. —Wknight94 (talk) 22:16, 11 February 2006 (UTC) (Vote copied from the previous Afd)
- Comment: I deleted the original as a copyvio, this is not the same content. No vote. User:Zoe|(talk) 04:02, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Wknight94. Mikker ... 04:06, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Wknight94. --Siva1979Talk to me05:52, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Wknight94. --Terence Ong 09:42, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep barely crosses the notability line, but on the notable side Avi 15:57, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Wknight94. - Ganeshk (talk) 01:11, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Wknight94. utcursch | talk 11:45, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.