Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vientiane treaty

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Keep, and turn into article on the real treaty. Noel (talk) 20:08, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Vientiane treaty

Delete.No objection to keeping the (sub?)stub. Hoax article, corollary of Eastern Pact. (There was a Vientiane treaty of 1973, but this wasn't it). Mark1 05:58, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. I can't speak English, but I believe you. --Asova 05:58, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
    • User's second edit. All edits have been trolling. RickK 06:15, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
    • I would vote to keep an article about the Vientiane Treaty of 1973 but not this article. I would like to rewrite this myself if I had the opportunity. Capitalistroadster 06:17, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Move to correctly capitalized entry, keep. — Phil Welch 09:50, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
    • I stubified the content and moved it to Vientiane Treaty. Vientiane treaty is currently set to be a redirect as long as the VfD expires. — Phil Welch 09:56, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
    • Why do you want to keep a hoax article? RickK 09:53, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
      • I deleted the hoax content because, as according to the original VfD listing you can plainly see above, "There was a Vientiane treaty of 1973, but this wasn't it". I stubified the content so it only has that information and moved it accordingly. — Phil Welch 09:56, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
        • Ah, okay, sorry. RickK 19:04, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
  • The article History of Laos mentions a "Vientiane cease-fire agreement in 1973". I googled with the words Vientiane "cease-fire agreement" and found some more information. In this address Victor N. Xiong writes about the "cease-fire agreement between the two Lao factions ... signed ... in Vientiane on February 21, 1973." (It goes on.) It seems that this treaty wasn't very meaningful. This could be a section on the History of Laos page. That way it could still be linked to if ever needed. Redirect. Wipe 14:46, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand. From my reading, this was a fairly significant treaty. Capitalistroadster 23:53, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.