Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidmem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:46, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vidmem

Vidmem (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

appears to be a neologism; no sources are given to suggest usage or notability JodyB _talk 00:22, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete : Not notable bdude Talk 00:52, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as neo. Unfortunately, neologisms cannot be speedied. It found it used in this fashion on google, but didn't spot any reliable sources. The only reliable sources I did find were actually discussing a dll file called VidMem. Someguy1221 08:06, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:04, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete non-notable neologism, no sources cited and I can't find any. Hut 8.5 15:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Hut 8.5. Possibly spam (see article name + dot com). --Dhartung | Talk 20:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. Pavel Vozenilek 12:31, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! -- Mailer Diablo 03:46, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.