Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victory tingle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by Majorly (talk · contribs) with summary This article or other page provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. It is patent nonsense (CSD G1). This non-admin closure was brought to you by →Ollie (talk • contribs) 00:19, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Victory tingle

Victory tingle (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Silly neologism with 0 ghits. Trying to coin a term, are we? Coren 00:01, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per CSD G1 (patent nonsense) on the basis of WP:NEO and WP:NFT. Will (aka Wimt) 00:05, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Note it has already been deleted under this once before and recreated. Will (aka Wimt) 00:06, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete Submitter states flat-out that the purpose was to popularize this newly-created term. "Violation" of WP:NFT. --Finngall ^talk 00:08, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

• • Comment - My reading of G1 doesn't fit: it's coherent nonsense. Very much WP:NFT but that makes it AfD fodder, not speedy. I think. Coren 00:10, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

• • Comment - Well then, oops. Sorry Wiki, and might I add, man you guys are fast at that picking these out.Brian Mattocjk 00:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.