Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Scott D'Angelo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge and redirect to Chuck Yeager; no individual notability established. - KrakatoaKatie 00:49, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Victoria Scott D'Angelo

Victoria Scott D'Angelo (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Being married to a notable person doesn't grant her notability. The information about arguments over assets is already in the Chuck Yeager article. Anything of worth from this stub should simply be merged into that article. IrishGuy ^talk 19:10, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

• Merge and redirect to Chuck Yeager per nom. Victoria, unfortunately, doesn't (yet) have enough notability to stand out on her own. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 21:16, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep for now - The subject is noteworthy in her own right, and further development of the article would demostrate such. Check-Six 21:41, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect, no individual notability established. --Dhartung | Talk 21:55, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
• Merge as suggested above as herself is not enough famous to gain a WP article for herself.JForget 22:35, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.