Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Gomelsky

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo (talk) 18:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Victoria Gomelsky

Victoria Gomelsky (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Notability not clear from article, lack of independent sources. Google results include some articles she's written for newspapers, but nothing else about her. Snigbrook 14:40, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:BIO; Personal web page indicates nothing worth noting - no awards from major entities, only niche-market Jewelry awards. Google turns up things she's written, but I see nothing that indicates there has been things written about her. WLU 15:04, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Do I need to re-post? I stand by my earlier assertion, delete. WLU (talk) 21:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Caknuck (talk) 20:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete No sources provided, and unable to find third party sources. Her writing, and jewelry journalism awards, don't seem to have resulted in any independent coverage. Maralia (talk) 01:52, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete not notable, or interesting without more info. I know "interesting" isn't part of WP policy, but maybe it should be. Wishing Ms Gomelsky well, and happy holidays to all. Steve Dufour (talk) 22:48, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.