Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Insulator Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --Coredesat 05:03, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Victor Insulator Company

Victor Insulator Company (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Non-notable company (despite its age), no context, not linked, no cat, not referenced, no sources. Ligulem 10:19, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

• And no keep too. Delete in its current form unless sources are provided. Kavadi carrier 10:30, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • It's going to be hard finding online sources, if anyone feels like expanding this. I can't even find an official website for the company. Kavadi carrier 10:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
    • REALLY? www.victorinsulators.com was that hard to find??? Unfocused 14:28, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
      • Neither searching for "Victor Insulator" [1] nor "Victor Insulator Company" [2] get you that website within the first two pages of results. Kavadi carrier 15:09, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
        • Your google-fu is lacking, grasshopper. Remove the quotes from your first query and the official company home page is the second link. [3] Unfocused 16:23, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• keep. Company is a pioneer in their field, and has been in business continuously for over 100 years. Unfocused 14:28, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

• I didn't know that age alone qualifies as being encyclopaedic. However, your are welcome to add something interesting to that boring article. It's rather like a directory entry. --Ligulem 13:20, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

• Keep Added reference stating it is the oldest insulator manufacturer in North America, which should qualify it notability-wise. Edison 03:46, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Edison's addition. Thanks for the amusement, Unfocused. --Oakshade 05:35, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Being the oldest company of its kind on its continent makes it reasonably noteworthy. Shimeru 07:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.