Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victimhood in America

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Flowerparty^☀ 02:24, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Victimhood in America

Victimhood in America (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Aborted and incomplete article, probably OR - there is too little to actually tell Lars T. (talk) 14:11, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. As Lars points out, there's too little information to say anything about this article, but based on a quick search I think it's unlikely to be notable in and of itself; given both that and the headers on the (empty) sections, I imagine that this article, if ever expanded, will be pure OR. However, there's a possibility that the creator will come back (after having edited nothing since creating the article) and make it clear what the article is based on, so I'm watching the page. I'll be willing to change my recommendation if the article turns out to fit the guidelines. AnturiaethwrTalk 17:31, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete obscure theory, incomplete article. Chimeric Glider (talk) 20:07, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, I don't believe this can become anything but an editor rant. WillOakland (talk) 21:54, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
• keep Plenty of sources to use on this topic. The theory is not not obscure just ignored as it is not very PC to talk about, it ties into discussions of structural violence. The article lists that it is in the process of being revamped, I would say leave it at that.65.11.23.219 (talk) 06:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment - there was one edit (the creation) almost a week ago, since then nothing, also nothing more from Obri0210 (talk · contribs) who created the article .Lars T. (talk) 14:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. The article seems to have been abandoned and looks like it might have included original research if it had been completed. Also, it is not clear that the article creator's view of victimhood is a view limited only to America; a global perspective would be preferable. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:24, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.