Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VickiAnn Chrobak-Sadowski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:00, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] VickiAnn Chrobak-Sadowski

Totally non-notable. Patrick 18:44, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete I can't even figure out why this was created. Yes, she's noteworthy to Price Is Right fans, but she's only notable even for that because she happened to win a lot of stuff through completely legitimate means on an episode that was designed to give away a lot of expensive prizes. There's no reason the page should exist. -TPIRFanSteve 20:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete biggest winings for a game show? No. Biggest winnigns for a daytime game show? No. Biggest wininngs for a daytime game show on CBS? not good enough. Guy 20:51, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Google News yields nothing for just "VickiAnn," so clearly this isn't as notable as other game show record winners. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:08, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. As I said on the nominated article's talk page, interesting contestants (young women in random people's opinions, like, for example, Amy from the 6000th show or Skyler from the 10/6/06 episode, etc.) and throwaway Showcases (in the case of top winner (usually women) passing Showcases to the runner-up and making his/her day worse by hoping he/she overbids on his/her showcase, yet the top winner prevails and brings many of her friends onstage to celebrate) are definitely non-notable. I removed the redlink from The Price is Right a week ago, as nobody knows anything about VickiAnn except for that win. --D.F. "Jun Kazama Master" Williams 04:31, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as being indiscriminate. Well put by User:WTGDMan1986. Ohconfucius 03:50, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.