Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vibroacoustic medicine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh 05:46, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vibroacoustic medicine

Vibroacoustic medicine (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

As written, this article has a number of serious issues. First of all, it was written as a promotional piece by User:Arthrifon to promote his company (Arthrifon, Inc). Furthermore, although it references a number of research articles, it is unclear whether these articles represent scientific consensus on the subject, and a number of significant claims aren't referenced - the claim that diseases can be detected with "tiny probes connected to electronic microscopes" seems particularly suspect. Another article by the same author (VibroAcoustic therapy) was deleted recently. Zetawoof_(ζ) 05:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Article is essentially WP:COATRACK for the company - not to mention poorly sourced. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 06:29, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete COI, COATRACK, OR, SPAM, FRINGE, V, tell me when to stop... Ψν^Psi_nu 12:06, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per Psinu Doc Strange (talk) 14:34, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Junk. Nick mallory (talk) 14:39, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, reads like an advert copied from a website, infringes loads of Wikipedia guidelines, almost beyond help. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{we need to talk.}☆ 21:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.