This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted at 18:03, 5 July 2005 by user:Snowspinner who commented "Vanity nonsense". Closing the discussion. Rossami(talk) 23:11, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
Delete - Vanity, my friends, all is vanity. Not notable either. Naturenet | Talk 5 July 2005 22:03 (UTC)
? Linked page does not exist. --Alex12 3 6 July 2005 00:39 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.