Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vexed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - copyvio too. Yomangani^talk 19:19, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vexed

Originally {{prod}}ded [1], reverted w/o explanation [2]. Article fails WP:SOFTWARE. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 17:47, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

• Hi, I'm the author of the article... Why is it proposed for deletion, am I missing something? —Preceding unsigned comment added by LucianaPavel (talk • contribs)

• Comment as the nominator said above, the article fails to explain how the product meets the criteria listed at WP:SOFTWARE. Please take a look at that page and, if Vexed meets the criteria, explain how it meets them. Oh, and please remember to sign your entries on talk pages (though not on articles) by placing ~~~~ at the end. Thanks Tonywalton  | Talk 11:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

• It's also probably copyright violation - compare it to this Mobile Tech Review page. CovenantD 19:21, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It is a copy vio, but it should be deleted because there is no coverage of subject by reliable, third-party published sources. -- Satori Son 05:02, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.