Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verbum Vanum

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 08:19, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Verbum Vanum

Some kind of free online library. Tagged for speedy deletion but I've brought it here. 24 Google hits for Verbum Vanum, [1], 300 for VerbumVanum [2]. No vote from me. Kappa 12:54, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete: It's not notable, and the current small article list makes it look like a collection of PD items and or original essays. If it becomes notable in the future, an article could then be created. Wikibofh 14:01, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: Wikipedia is not a web guide. Even if it's a huge Internet library, it has to be truly significant to require an encyclopedia article to explain it. If it's not truly significant, then the resulting article, no matter how NPOV, is advertising. Geogre 18:33, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not-a-web-guide, no indication of any distinction or significance in its field. Barno 19:58, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - only 19 Google hits - completely unotable. Blackcats 20:33, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.