Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vennis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.--Húsönd 20:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vennis

Vennis (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. Contested prod. ... discospinster _talk 14:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - per nom. Most google hits for "Vennis" point to some guy in the movie industry. The few unique links out there seem to be mirrors of the wiki article. Also, here are the reasons given for keeping the article on the talk page:

1. Original Research being done to determine the true history of the sport
2. At least one originally researched paper written or being written to be published on the sport
3. Rome was not thought of one day at school and neither was Vennis

The first two go right out the window as original research, and the third can be dismissed by the following clarification: Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. As the guideline states, "it is not article material until a secondary source reports on it". →Bobby← 14:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Caknuck 14:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Robertbcole. hateless 20:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and LOL at comparing garbage made up by bored teens to Rome. Danny Lilithborne 22:02, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.