Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venetian People's Movement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per nom withdraw. Dusti^{talk to me} 17:45, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Venetian People's Movement

Venetian People's Movement (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Fails WP:RS. Could not find refs or news. NN. Taroaldo (talk) 21:50, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

• Keep. It is a regional party active in Veneto, as Liga Veneta or Liga Veneta Repubblica. Moreover its leader is a regional deputy and would-be regional minister.The article has even a reference. It is a stub, but I can't find any reason for deleting it. --Checco (talk) 21:54, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

There's a huge number of sources telling us of the party. I just put in the article the six most notable ones, mostly articles from leading Italian newspapers. --Checco (talk) 22:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

• Keep Article is now well-sourced from a variety of reliable secondary sources. - Dravecky (talk) 23:22, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Comment It would be nice if the sources met WP:RSUE --- Taroaldo (talk) 05:05, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

• Keep per Checco. Bad quality of sources is no reason to delete an encyclopedic article. —Nightstallion 10:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per Checco. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 11:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
• Withdraw My concerns remain unchanged, but given the consistency of the views presented in this RfA, I am prepared at this point to withdraw the nom. --- Taroaldo (talk) 17:28, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.