Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veit Kühne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Article does not really establish any notability to Kühne outside the Hospitality Club he founded and he is already mentioned in that article. JIP | Talk 23:10, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Veit_Kühne

Delete not notable person after Wikipedia rules. His role as founder of Hospitality Club is already mentioned in the Hospitality Club article and does not justify a separate entry. Splette 09:48, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as nn-bio. --Terence Ong 11:10, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Ruby 15:32, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Was elected a local official only and HC involvement doesn't make him newsworthy. --Valmi ✒ 21:59, 20 February 2006 (UTC) (have POV)
• Delete. Not really of interest.--Dagox 16:56, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep He is basically in charge for an organisation of over 100.000 people, with the goal to reach 1 million - in fact, there's not even an organisation, it's all in his name. That definitely justifies an article about him. Please link to the standards which say it doesn't justify an entry, and explain why.
  If this article still needs to go, then it should become a part of the Hospitality Club article, considering the importance of Veit within HC. Guaka (can't find those round thingies on this keyboard) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guaka (talk • contribs) 15:47, 21 February 2006

see WP:BIO. - FrancisTyers 15:58, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep just barely meeting notability guidelines, but there has to be that someone who is the last one over the line. Founding and running an organization that has 100,000 members (someone's verified this?) seems to be notable enough. Carlossuarez46 20:57, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.