Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vasoarrhythmia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep and expand, tagged as such. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vasoarrhythmia

Vasoarrhythmia (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Transwikied dictionary definition TexasAndroid (talk) 14:15, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

• Keep. This is a valid stub on an encyclopedic subject which is perfectly capable of being expanded beyond a dictionary definition - in fact I've just done so even this is way outside any of my fields of expertise. I'm sure someone who knows about the subject with access to the academic sources could write plenty more. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:34, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Seems notable by the reference provided. A notable stub, and should belong in an encyclopedia. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 16:06, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Only two references in PubMed (one of which is the original of the one currently cited by the article, which is itself a reprint), both by the same author. It doesn't appear to be a well-established term, or phenomenon, in the medical community. No other articles appear to have picked up the term, despite the fact that these two articles were published over a decade ago. Chuck (talk) 05:32, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Keep seems notable stub per WP:N. It does need expansion, however.--Sallicio 20:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.