Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vampirism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was revert to redirect. Calling WP:SNOW on this ridiculous... thing.-Wafulz (talk) 14:01, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Vampirism
Reads like an enlistment brochure crossed with a how-to manual. No references cited. Would need a complete re-write even if it is a valid topic.
User appears to have cannibalized the FA "vampire" for the talk page when the redirect was cut. Matt Deres (talk) 12:14, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Jeandré, 2008-05-11t14:31z
- Delete this unreferenced tripe that looks like it was made up in one day by some bored high school students, and once it is deleted, create a redirect to vampire which is where the legitimate article on this topic can be found. KleenupKrew (talk) 14:39, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to vampire. Spartacusprime (talk) 19:25, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete A blatant hoax. Paging Dr. Val Helsing. Ecoleetage (talk) 21:29, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete moronic religioncruft. JuJube (talk) 00:20, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete All these information has been lifted from the Temple of the Vampire's website (Link) without permission. In any case, certainly NOT an encyclopaedic entry in any way. GDA9 (talk) 12:48, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:01, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. While there may be an encyclopedic topic here (perhaps some medical condition bearing the name, or whatever), this ain't it. I don't have any objection to a redirect to Vampire, in the absence of a better target. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 12:07, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
