Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vampire (The Matrix)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tim Vickers (talk) 19:34, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vampire (The Matrix)

Vampire (The Matrix) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article is just a repetition of gameplay and plot elements from the Enter the Matrix video game, and has no sourcing or notability of its own. As such, it is totally duplicative of information already in that article, and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. RogueNinja_talk 23:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. No sources given. No assertion that this is notable outside the context of the movies and their marketing franchise, and therefore it should not be separated from the articles about the movies/comics/video game. Argyriou (talk) 06:30, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

• Keep It just looks awesome and I can see there has been put a lot of work into it. Just give it's creator another chance to reference it properly and see whether it can be kept. Let us all keep up good faith here. Ramtashaniku (talk) 15:33, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Looking awesome and people working on it are not valid reasons to keep an article. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:48, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

For me it is. At least the fact there has been done so much work on it much get you all think. Try to ask the people who work on it whether they can reference it or not. If they can, nothing is wrong, if they cannot, delete it. But at least give them time to respond properly! Ramtashaniku (talk) 18:29, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom; that you like something is not logical as far as this a discussion here is concerned. The article has no verifiability, is merely a restatement of original research and/or information from some personal diary, and appears to concern minor characters. Bearian (talk) 18:15, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. There are no references, so it is apparently Non-Notable OR. And it is completely ridiculous to have such cruft about movie characters. NBeale (talk) 16:37, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.