Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaginahead
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted by Tom harrison[1]. Michaelas10 (Talk) 22:17, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Vaginahead
Neologism. entirely OR. Dicdef. No references. Should be speedied but doesn't seem to fit any of the categories. ⇒ SWATJester On Belay! 21:22, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- DELETE complete and utter nonsense. JohnCub 21:24, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - (edit conflict) Wikipedia is not for things made up in one school day and Wikipedia should avoid protologisms. PTO 21:24, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as speedily as possible. Neologism and nonsense --Slp1 21:28, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NFT --killing sparrows 21:33, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like our friend Briguy2186 created yet another entry, this time titled Vaginhead. I've marked it for speedy, as Briguy2186 is obviously just a vandal. I think we should go ahead and speedy Vaginahead too and probably block Briguy2186, but that's just my 2 cents. Rockstar915 21:35, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete under WP:SNOW. I'd reiterate NFT if it wasn't already painfully obvious. — coelacan — 21:38, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom. Finngall 21:44, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - I've never heard the term. Even if it exists, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Canthusus 21:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
