Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaginadon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete - crude vandalism. -- RHaworth 07:36, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vaginadon

Originally proded by User:Polotet. When the prod was placed on the article, it was an exact copy of the T-Rex article. Since then the page creator has changed the article to go along with this hoax idea. I seriously doubt that Vaginadon is a legitimate scientific term, othwerise I would redirect. --Hetar 05:48, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

• Strong Delete, speedy if possible - look at the obscene references and toilet-hoax in the text. ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! 05:52, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Obvious hoax, and the word gets no dinosaur related hits on google. Delete.-Polotet 06:29, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete stupid unfunny hoax. Can't they at least come up with something remotely funny? Lambiam^Talk 05:56, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as obvious hoax. Not nearly funny enough for Uncyclopedia. Capitalistroadster 06:15, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No room for this kind of nonsense here. --Valermos 06:28, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete, hoax. So many things wrong with it, from the incorrect fake Greek name all the way through. --blue520 06:43, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.