Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vagina envy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mackensen (talk) 16:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vagina envy

Vagina envy (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This seems like original research, or borderline nonsense. There's already a womb envy article, which is a legitimate concept. That article contains sources. The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 20:53, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete original research, lacking in sources and references, if indeed there are any. (aeropagitica) 21:11, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. seems real enough per stuff like this and so forth. Doesn't need to be super-notable as long it's used a bit by real psychologists etc. Article pretty poor though, I'd reduce it to a one-sentence stub as there are no references cited. Herostratus 21:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I would suggest merge to Penis envy, but the feminists would have a fit. Wavy G 22:02, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I suffer from vagina envy. Keep. - Mig (Talk) 22:45, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to womb envy as possible search term. Shimeru 23:14, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep but article badly needs referencing. Multiple hits on Google books [1] Bwithh 00:15, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep if rewritten, otherwise delete. Some hits on Google scholar. Coined by Felix Böhm (a psychiatrist) during pre-war period (likely in 1927). Should be named "vagina envy theory". Pavel Vozenilek 01:45, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep But focus seems overly centered on the awesomeness of the female orgasm and not on actual vagina envy. ReverendG 05:02, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge with womb envy. --- RockMFR 15:34, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Exactly what content would we be merging? The writing in the vagina envy article is poor and the tone rather informal. I don't see anything there that belongs in a serious article.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 15:40, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge anything good to penis envy or womb envy or what have you. Yankee Rajput 23:04, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. This is not the same as womb envy. --- RockMFR 15:41, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect into womb envy; even though they are different concepts, they are related. Do not merge into penis envy. 69.140.173.15 16:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.