Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V-ology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 10:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] V-ology

del. Nonsense religion. Unfortunately not speedy `'mikka (t) 22:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

ATTENTION! If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}

• KEEP: This page simply must continue to exist! I am a devout follower of v-ology, and I see no reason why our religion should not be advertised on the world wide web. Deleting this page would be xenophobia of the highest order! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.102.0.178 (talk • contribs)
• Delete per nom (and even if it weren't nonsense, then WP:NOT indiscriminate collection of information) --Mnemeson 23:30, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as something made up in school one day.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 23:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• KEEP What people are failing to see is the definition of a religion. V-ology is a way of life, a system of beleifs, the arguements that it is simply something made up in school one day is also false. If you were to email one of the editors/creators of the page then you would find that we have a very solid system of beleifs and have followed this for quite a few years. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weedwacker01 (talk • contribs)
• Delete It's religioncruft, regardless of the ridiculous argument of the person above me. Danny Lilithborne 02:44, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:VSCA. Non-notable religion mad up to sell energy drink. Even the follower above admits it's advertising. Ohconfucius 04:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as complete bollocks. Molerat 10:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Wikipedia is not a soapbox for "advertising on the world wide web" a made-up religion that, from what I can find, has no existence whatsoever outside of this Wikipedia article. Delete. Uncle G 19:21, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Per Uncle G. There doesn't seem to be any hint of its existence outside this article. If it were a notable religion, then certainly there'd be more information out there.
• Delete. Let's keep it simple: no verification of notability or accuracy. SvenC 22:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete due to lack of evidence it notable. Nickieee 20:47, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.