Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V-COM Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 13:51, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] V-COM Records

V-COM Records (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete Meets criteria for immediate administration of the Banhammer per WP:CORP. Every single blue link on the page links to something completely unrrelated to the article itself. 0% notable. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 01:57, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete as spam; no WP:RS, no WP:V. Bearian (talk) 02:04, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete for failure of WP:CORP, falls way short of notability; doesn't seem to have any reliable bands signed. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:28, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:MUSIC. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:53, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, fails both WP:MUSIC and WP:CORP fairly comprehensively. Lankiveil ^{(complaints | disco)} 13:16, 25 January 2008 (UTC).
• Note: WikiProject Companies has been informed of this ongoing discussion. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 17:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per all above. Midorihana^{~いいですね？} 02:00, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete because their dismissal of my record contract killed my musical career. Just kidding: never heard of them; doubt we ever will. --LeyteWolfer (talk) 18:28, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.