Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User talk talk:Mikkalai

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deleted by sole contributor. mikka (t) 21:24, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] User talk talk:Mikkalai

Speedy delete, empty article in the main namespace that looks like it was intended to be created as User talk:Mikkalai/Temp or something within the User talk: namespace. Page is protected, so I'm not able to put {{db-empty}} on it. Author's own talk page is protected so I'm not able to notify them of the issue. Interiot 20:12, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

  • The page is protected against trolling in my user space. If you cannot do something, don't. Respect other people's intentions. mikka (t) 20:41, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
    • User talk talk:Mikkalai is in the mainspace though, not the userspace, that's why the issue came up. If it could be moved to something starting with "User:" or "User talk:", there'd be no issue. (though in addition, Wikipedia:Protection policy says that "Talk pages and user talk pages are not protected as a rule, except in extreme circumstances.") --Interiot 20:45, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
      • Right. I am about to leave on vacation and don't want garbage floating around my page while I am gone. mikka (t) 20:50, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete and padlock as recreated deleted page. It was recreated one minute after deletion by admin. B.Wind 20:53, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
    • You obviously didn't encoutner this kind of problem (developer's problem). Let me demonstrate it for you. Just go to User talk talk:Mikkalai and start clicking "its talk page" links. The problem is with the implementation of substitution of templates placed at talk pages which refer to "its talk page". mikka (t) 20:58, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

OK. I deleted it, asince it attracted attention, and I don't want to waste people time. mikka (t) 21:24, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.