Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User adoption

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. NSLE _(T+C) at 05:08 UTC (2006-05-25)

[edit] User adoption

This is an orphoned article written in management/business speak. As far as I can tell the article is on a management policy of trivial importance but, given that I don't work in this field, I might be wrong; but I doubt it. Rje 14:09, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. written poorly but if reworded i think it could be useful. THE KING 18:33, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Effective User Adoption is when the users use the system! Neologism with little currency, dictdef Dlyons493 Talk 19:28, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, eek, I have to put up with rubbish written like this at work, I don't want to do the same here. nn marketing term. Lankiveil 23:52, 20 May 2006 (UTC).
• Delete, non-notable, unverifiable neologism, i.e. protologism. Stifle (talk) 22:36, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.