Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User:¹ articles

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedied as vandalism. I trust the judgment of the five editors below who expressed desire to have this speedily deleted as such. android79 21:37, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] User:¹ articles: Strange cakes, Five-leaf haresbane, Battleaxe chronicles, Delloi, and Littel

User:¹ (contribs) has created several articles which all look very dubious to me: Strange cakes, Five-leaf haresbane, Battleaxe chronicles, Delloi, and Littel. I can't find any evidence for any of these on Google. The user's other edits, to five other articles (all in the last day) all look suspicious too, but I dont know enough about the subjects to say for sure. Finally, the user page ("I'm script1 and I'm super") screams danger, danger. I think all these edits are a sophisticated hoax that has wasted an hour of my day. sjorford #£@%&$?! 14:22, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

(Note: I've relisted this on today's page, as since the heading wasn't linked originally, it seems people may have missed in when scanning down the page. sjorford #£@%&$?! 19:04, 16 September 2005 (UTC))

• I speedied delloi, no such thing. The rest is not my knowledge, but judging from lack of context, I vote delete for all for the reasons of non-verifiability. mikka (t) 19:11, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete All of the above pages should be speedied as vandalism. None of these subjects are remotely verifiable or real and are pretty obviously page creation vandalism.--Isotope23 19:35, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, per Isotope23. Creation of one obvious hoax puts the remaining unverifiable contributions in serious doubt. -- BD2412 ^talk 19:42, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete The curate's egg 20:09, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete although "hoax" technically isn't a speedy criteria (yet), one user creating a whole slew of fake articles is obviously a form of vandalism. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:58, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete The OED doesn't have littel or harebane although there are two Google hits for the latter which lend it some plausibility. However the other timewasting is far worse than obvious nonsense - so get rid of the lot unless a real botanist knows better. Dlyons493 21:08, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.