Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Usenet cabal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge and redirect. Nandesuka 03:16, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Usenet cabal

not-notable neologism that's unsourced and wikipedia is not a dictionary. Fictious possibly, even. Yewtalonwyrd 19:37, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: this is not a neologism, and the idea is not ficticious[1], but the current article fails WP:V. It should be cleaned up. No vote. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 21:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• I don't see any new information here that isn't at backbone cabal, so redirect. —C.Fred (talk) 22:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect as per C.Fred. Lazybum 01:48, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Not a neologism, not fictitious. Redundant with backbone cabal. Merge or redirect. Ddama 05:37, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge or Redirect as per Ddama. --Cybercobra 02:15, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per above. Killfest2—Daniel.Bryant 00:47, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.