Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Usb8x

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no concensus, so kept. JYolkowski // talk 16:51, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Usb8x

Why is this notable? We agreed to delete "ticalc.org" from WP, why not this? Frenchman113 00:49, August 21, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, Wikipedia is not place to record every SW ever writtn. Pavel Vozenilek 01:37, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. It is notable in the calculator programming/hacking community, but I don't feel that it is for WP, especially since you thought ticalc.org isn't (though, I think the ticalc.org article would have been but I unfortunately wasn't around to vote on that VfD). --Andy Janata 01:38, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, notable in the calculator programming/hacking community. Kappa 03:18, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
  • In which case we should definitely undelete the article on ticalc.org. --Andy Janata 04:46, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per Pavel Vozenilek. --Lomedae 12:24, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Pavel. Nandesuka 00:08, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Pavel. Making shareware and putting it on a webpage is too easy. Radiant_>|< 10:16, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and Cleanup, per Wikipedia:Importance#Policy item number 1 in the first list. At least 500 people at ticalc.org (which also should be undeleted per this reasoning) and other calculator communities are interested in using the USB port on the TI-84+. --Andy Janata 22:05, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.