Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ursidphobia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedily Deleted (non-admin closure) by Orangemike, WP:CSD#G3, "hoax word". WilliamH (talk) 17:20, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Ursidphobia
Contested prod. Dictionary definition for a word from a systematic pattern of names. No references and 0 Ghits to indicate that this term is actually used in a clinical setting. Delete as WP:Verifiability, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball unless reliable sources are provided to show that this word was not just made up by a Steven Colbert fan.[1] --Allen3 talk 02:01, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- I contested the ProD mainly to solicit community input. My vote would be to redirect to specific phobia; however, it is possible that it's a misspelling, in which case I would have no objection to deletion. (I acknowledge this falls under WP:DICTIONARY, but WP:CRYSTAL is inapplicable.) 69.140.152.55 (talk) 02:19, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, do not redirect a word which has no reliable sources that it even exists. Corvus cornixtalk 02:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. JIP | Talk 05:01, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete wp:neologism, only google hit is wikipedia...victor falk 12:53, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G3. Blatant disinformation/vandalism. User:Nickbay clearly created this just so he could substantiate a comment left here. WilliamH (talk) 15:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
