Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uroinvixi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. ~~ N (t/c) 23:35, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Uroinvixi

It is my great pleasure to present for your consideration this rather blatant and unfunny hoax. Ashibaka (tock) 02:43, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep', I'm not sure how to use this, but I would keep it. This article was linked to from one of these Yahoo groups (it has tons of members) and there are people in there praising this article saying its long overdue. At least these groups and maybe this article can help a lot of people know they aren't the only ones who like doing this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.24.42.119 (talk • contribs) 15:22 EDT, 9 September 2005
    • Which yahoo group? Might be able to get some verification there. DES (talk) 20:34, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, term gets 0 Google hits. - SimonP 03:39, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • BJAODN, it made me laugh :P Rbarreira 03:40, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  • BJAODNing now. Karmafist 03:46, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  • BJAODN. Nateji77 03:50, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete I wasn't sure that it was a hoax at first, some strange sexual fetishes do exist, but trying a search I found absolutely nothing. PatGallacher 10:39, 2005 September 9 (UTC)
  • Delete. WMMartin 12:44, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - sounds like another of Alex Duensing's students doing his homework ---Outlander 15:50, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom. See Wikipedia:School and university projects#University of South Florida for more on how this page was probably created. DES (talk) 18:35, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - IP doesn't appear to link to USF, but it's NN and not a verified term; appears to be neologism if it is not a hoax. That pic cracked me up though. --Isotope23 20:29, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  • DeleteMost likely a hoax, non notable at best. Johntex\talk 20:57, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete this nonsense... and the image too! -- BD2412 talk 22:12, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Rename to something else. Such practice does exist in Japan. (But obviously not the term). That's all I know. SYSS Mouse 22:20, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. A fetish never mentioned on Usenet must be a hoax (and this probably trumps the Yahoo Groups claim, I'd think). — mendel ☎ 03:28, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete it and the picture too without reservations This link is Broken 15:49, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
  • BJAODN unless references are provided. In that case, consider moving to a more descriptive name - we don't invent names here (that's assuming references don't include the name...still, 0 google hits is usually a proof enough). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 03:42, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Crush by elephant. --FOo 05:55, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
  • I believe this fetish does exist, but I don't have the faintest idea of what its name is. If anyone can find a real name (i.e. at least 1000 Google hits) for it rename, else delete.--Army1987 18:56, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.