Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urdu Wikipedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 21:04, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Urdu Wikipedia

Non-notable website (Liberatore, 2006). 16:23, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

• Strong Keep, the other language wikipedias have articles as well. Saying that Urdu Wikipedia is non-notable is like saying that English Wikipedia is non-notable. That just doesn't make sense! Easter rising 16:35, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep we always get a few of these self-referential AfDs in which someone applies notability guidelines to areas of Wikipedia itself. Not a good idea. Just keep it. AdamBiswanger1 16:47, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Wikipedia is a notable organisation with a large article that requires seperate language versions to be spun off. Easy as 31.4159 WilyD 16:51, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment, no reason to delete 1 language wikipedia, but I'm not sure I agree with any of the language Wikipedia's having mainspace articles as it seems a bit too self-referential. Still, this should be something that is decided and applied across the board, not to just one specific language variant.--Isotope23 16:57, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

  A mass nomination of Category:Wikipedias by language, you mean? Why not? (Liberatore, 2006). 17:49, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, Wikipedia is a notable encyclopedia. Punkmorten 19:35, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, I hadn't realized other wikis had articles here; it does seem odd, but consistent; and some may have useful information about the projects that aren't available elsewhere, at least to english speakers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanbeg (talk • contribs)
• Keep per the unsigned above. -- Steel 23:39, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete none of the wikipedias should have a seperate mainspace article, better to have all the info in Wikipedia article or in the meta.wikipedia. --Eivind^t@c 03:58, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.