Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urbis Interminatus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 22:02, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Urbis Interminatus

People seem to be pissed at this article, either a hoax or made-up. 10,800 hits on Google, many part of a fan site for the building or mirrors of Wikipedia. I'm going to vote delete. SushiGeek 08:37, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment - holy crap what's going on here?! A new search without "Wikipedia" returns waaaay fewer hits. Weird. Grandmasterka 08:50, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

That's exactly it. SushiGeek 08:58, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment deficient Latinity. (What would John Cleese make of this one? Urbis is genitive and feminine, interminatus is masculine and singular.) This makes me suspect it's a hoax: a real project would presumably get its Latin right.
• Delete. Seems to be some architects' pipe dream. WP:NOT a crystal ball. Sandstein 14:12, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Sandstein. --MaNeMeBasat 14:30, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Sandstein. --Deville (Talk) 15:09, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 03:13, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: I'm assuming hoax on the basis of the incorrect Latin grammar. Peter Grey 02:54, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.