Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban Animal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. alphaChimp^(talk) 00:14, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Urban Animal

A magazine which scores well under a thousand Googles (complicated by the existence of a similarly titled magazine in Sydney, Australia). Unsourced, most of the top ghits are spam. So: a worthy endeavour but of no objectively provable significance. Guy 21:44, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mangojuice^talk 05:43, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Mangojuice^talk 05:43, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - fails all guidelines and policies for inclusion, including WP:CORP. --Storkk 23:32, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.