Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upsilon Alpha Beta

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete --cesarb 22:32, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Upsilon Alpha Beta

Non-notable frat with 46 google hits, less than 10 of those having anything to do with Upsilon Alpha Beta specifically. Jeffrey O. Gustafson 08:15, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable says it all! Sonic Mew 11:30, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete if not expanded: We have other frats, so, since the camel's nose is in the tent, we have to let it in, I'm afraid. If they have more than one chapter, then they can stay, but they have to be expanded. N.b. specific chapters are likely to be added as stand-alone articles, and they should just be redirects to this one (if it's expanded). Geogre 15:27, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, expand if it can be demonstrated that this is an active organization with chapters at more than a handful of different colleges/universities. Such organizations are typically notable. -- BD2412 ^talk 16:46, 2005 Jun 12 (UTC)
• Delete Not noteable. ConeyCyclone 17:46, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Account created 17:05, 12 Jun 2005 and mostly used to vote on VfD's. Kaibabsquirrel 21:19, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete notability not established. JamesBurns 04:15, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Comment - I left a comment on their "official" webpage. If they can't be bothered to fix up their orgs own page, I won't be bothered with the outcome. -- BD2412 ^talk 02:45, 2005 Jun 15 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.