Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upland rd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete - Liberatore(T) 18:32, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Upland rd

Simply Non notable Adambiswanger1 00:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. I added some links and categories to make the article more useful. Several other streets and roads in Australia and elsewhere have their own articles. TruthbringerToronto 01:08, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I used to live nearby. It is a nice street, with pavemants and traffic – just like every other street. Clear case of Wikipedia:List of really, really, really stupid article ideas that you really, really, really should not create. --Ezeu 01:19, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - I am from Australia and this is a street in a suburb. It is not a highway or main road or hisotric interest.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 01:34, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I came across this page after condering a rental property on upland road. I found it extremely useful to know the traffic conditions and the frequency of student use. If this topic has been of interest to someone enough to write a page about it and useful to someone like me planning on moving to the area there is no reason why it should be deleted.big_jas 01:46, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I know not of Australian road geography, but I do know that the article does not assert why this road is more important than any other one. -- Kicking222 01:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia. Doesn't hurt anything. --Ephilei 02:42, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Ezeu and Blnguyen. Accurizer 02:44, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I concur. Having been here myself, it is not a notable street, certainly not more than any other in this part of Brisbane and indeed actually less so. WP is not a UBD or street atlas. SM247 03:02, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. per nom. WP is not a repository for everything. Tychocat 03:05, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete if WP had an article for every random street it would have millions more pages! —Mets501^talk 03:19, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The article doesn't explain why this street is notable enough to warrant an article. Possibly might be worth a mention in our article on St Lucia, Queensland but definitely not as a standalone article. Capitalistroadster 04:19, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 04:19, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment this has no merit at all, so don't worry about the St Lucia article. Jammo (SM247) 06:01, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete If the street had historical importance, such as the original road through the UQ campus, or something like that, then it might have a place. Its use by UQ students is not worthy of an article (Note: My possible anti-UQ bias is already declared on my user page under the studying at QUT statement) Ansell 09:22, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - street is not notable and nothing notable has happenned there - Peripitus (Talk) 12:02, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• delete per Kicking222 and Ezeu. Mr Stephen 13:55, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Jammo (SM247). Someone living in the area should know whether it is notable or not. A note could be added to the St Lucia, Queensland article, but not more. -- ReyBrujo 15:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Streets in general do not need their own pages per some guideline somewhere... Wickethewok 15:43, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn street Computerjoe's talk 16:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia, but it is an encyclopedia, not a street plan.
  If the world has gone sufficiently mad that this is actually not deleted, it should at the very least be renamed to something reflecting its geographical (un)importance. — Haeleth Talk 16:30, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable street. --Roisterer 03:04, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable street. --Starionwolf 23:16, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delte as per Blnguyen and nominator. Nn street. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 14:58, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.