Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Up front gaming
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 16:57, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Up front gaming
let it stay, it's doing no harm and if someone wrote it then why delete it?
vanity. 3000 posts since its inception almost two years ago and a google pagerank of 3. this board is only notable for its extreme lack of notability. 70.98.54.10
- Delete: Nothing more than your run of the mill online forum. No alexa rank available. By all indications it fails WP:WEB. --Hetar 07:05, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:WEB. Batmanand | Talk 09:05, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:WEB. --Coredesat 10:13, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per above, fails WP:WEB doktorb | words 10:14, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --DaveG12345 20:27, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - Leave it there as it's doing no harm, if it gets little views then it isn't harming Wikipedia so just let it be! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.104.160.9 (talk • contribs) .
- Wikipedia is not a soapbox. This article is thinly vieled spam that almost certainly benifits no wikipedian and almost definitly benifits that (or dare I say your) website.
- Also, the article is very unencyclopedic. "The forum software is the best on the market", for instance. If this article were to stay, it would need to be cleaned up, and any wikipedian who would do so would be wasting their time. In fact, that's what this article is - a waste of time. Anyone who reads it is likely going to want their two minutes back after having read it. Unfortunately, nothing can be done to recover that lost time, but deleting the article is the next best thing. 70.98.54.10
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.