Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled second Pussycat Doll Album

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphim♥Whipp 00:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Untitled second Pussycat Doll Album

Untitled second Pussycat Doll Album (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Yet another of these articles on future albums without even a confirmed title. This one also has a reference problem and is orphaned to boot. As with the others, deletion is in order per WP:CBALL. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 22:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:37, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. I've yet to see a "X's Nth Untitled Album" type article show notability, and this one doesn't, either.--Fabrictramp (talk) 22:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
    In Rainbows. On another note, delete. Sceptre (talk) 00:49, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Wait until an album title is given before recreating this. Fails per WP:NOTCRYSTAL.--Sting au Buzz Me... 22:45, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per TenPoundHammer's law: if the name of the album isn't actually known, there's no way in hell that it'll survive an AfD. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:50, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. This or that might happen in the future is not suitable for an encyclopedia article. Nk.sheridan   Talk 23:43, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • For crying out loud! Is it not possible to salt all possible permutations of this article title, so we don't end up having the same discussion every two weeks? PC78 (talk) 00:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per the usual "untitled", "sophomore", "upcoming" ridiculousness cited in TPH's law. We need to create some kind of guideline, probably WP:UNKNOWN. Nate • (chatter) 01:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete — Wouldn't everyone be better served if this reoccurring Crystal Ball style article became a new speedy delete category? -- KelleyCook (talk) 13:08, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete appears to be crystal-ballism...again. This is about the 5th or 6th time this article has been up for deletion, under yet another title. It's been speedied a few times too. Acalamari 20:59, 16 May 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.