Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unloved

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:25, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unloved

Unloved (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

dipusted PROD for student film that makes no assertion of notability Cornell Rockey 02:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

• delete as nominator Cornell Rockey 02:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - a nomination constitutes a delete !vote. --Dennisthe2 03:06, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Not only a student film (which has a hard time even gaining notability), but factor incrystalballery, also. --Dennisthe2 03:15, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable student film. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Un-sourced crystalballery. Probably a conflict of interest given the level of non-notability. Leebo ^T/C 03:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete A7 as nonnotable; looks like the pages I see at WP:NPP too often. YechielMan 03:42, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable student film. Maxamegalon2000 05:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity page. - Iridescenti (talk to me!) 09:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, low budget film by amateurs, and it's not even created yet. Definately doesn't belong. --Wirbelwindヴィルヴェルヴィント (talk) 04:55, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable amateur film which hasn't even completed production. Burntsauce 20:44, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.