Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University television

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Many of the keep voters also indicated dissatisfaction with the article as it now is, since it was little more than a list of external links. However, an encyclopedic article could be written on this topic, so I am deleting without prejudice against an improved article. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:33, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] University television

Article serves only as a repository of external links. Haakon 17:23, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. It should be expanded, but it's at least somewhat informative. Aplomado - UTC 17:50, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep if expanded. Grafikm_fr 18:24, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Err, Delete. When was the criterion about mere lists of external links being disallowed rescinded? RGTraynor 18:33, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. An internal list of university television stations might be appropriate, but not under this title. Fagstein 06:59, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above — Hillel 16:11, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. It's just a bunch of external links- in fact, it's not even a bunch, just a few. Unless the list is going to be interwiki links, and include every TV station run by a college or university, there's no reason for it to exist. -- Kicking222 18:09, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--Isotope23 20:46, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep the current article does not have enough context/description, but such context exists, so it should be expanded rather than deleted. Something similar to Campus radio would be appropriate. Ziggurat 22:03, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep but expand heavily. The current article is poor, but the subject is worthy of an article. matturn 12:45, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete without prejudice to recreation of a proper article. The current version barely escapes speedy deletion under CSD:A3. Stifle (talk) 19:57, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. Only contains external links. Vegaswikian 05:56, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Too speculative and without a solid set of criteria in order to distinguish which stations and shows of importance from those of non-importance.--Cini 18:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.