The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete due to the lack of reliable sources covering the holiday. Davewild (talk) 21:15, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
The non-notable "holiday" appears to be a little too unofficial Ecoleetage (talk) 01:22, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Quite possibly a hoax. No sources cited and I could not find anything at all after a bit of Google searching. Nsk92 (talk) 02:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete - Per Nsk92. Tagged as possible hoax. aseninesay what? 05:45, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.